or at least, are scandalous!
In my innocent attempt to link Emma Brocke’s name to her bio (and let’s be serious, that means her wikipedia page unless it looks to be super obviously un-fact-checked) I managed to learn that she was at the heart of a journalistic scandal regarding her accuracy in reporting an interview…with Noam Chomsky.
Now, I’m no Media Studies major, but it seems like a bad idea to throw down with Noam.
The best part: at the center of this maelstrom was the question of whether or not he used sarcastic quote marks to describe a massacre. Or, in this case, a ‘massacre’ <rolls eyes>. LOL! OMG, seriously?!? Lest you think I jest, allow me to CTRL+V:
‘The final text and page layout suggested that Chomsky had downplayed the 1995 massacre in Srebrenica, in part by using the word massacre in ironic quotes. Chomsky immediately asked for a citation of anything in print where he had used the word massacre in ironic quotes with reference to the Srebrenica massacre, and none was provided. .[2]‘
I learned from Colbert that if you’re on Cable News (which I’m not, but still) you don’t have to report the news. You simply have to ask questions about events. And you can frame them however you like.
So I ask you: is this whole scandal an example of what the so-called ‘Gen X’ has done to journalism?!?



